Global warming or global sham? Real emergency or conspiracy to hike taxes? Controversial climate sceptic Lord Christopher Monckton joins Oksana to untangle t…
Video Rating: 3 / 5
Global warming or global sham? Real emergency or conspiracy to hike taxes? Controversial climate sceptic Lord Christopher Monckton joins Oksana to untangle t…
Video Rating: 3 / 5
These industries only care about higher profits and they can careless
about the environment because as they foolishly think; ” Their gas
emissions aren’t harming anything.” Idiots
Dumb dumb dumb.. her knowledge of pollutants and CO2 is a big fat ZERO. Do
a tiny bit of reading about a subject before you start babbling and
pontificating, hun, you just embarrassed yourself terribly.
Whenever these nutcases realize they are losing the argument of course they
go back to Bush. It is all they have. You see climate change is true
because she hates Bush. Liberal logic. By the way Okasana, last time I
checked your nation, the same nation that committed genocide in Chechnya,
bulldozed Georgia and infiltrates Ukrainian politics, not exactly minding
its own business, is a permanent member of the UN security council. You
voted for this when you could have vetoed or abstained. Not just on Res,
1441 but over twenty other US led resolutions against Saddam. But now you
have a problem with it. Hypocrite. Way to make sure that no one can stop
the slaughter in Syria, even blocking humanitarian missions. And of course
supporting the world’s most brutal regime in North Korea is also oh so
wonderful of you. Have fun brutalizing gay people and fishing in the
toilet.
97% of ALL CLIMATE EXPERTS agree man made global warming is real. The Koch
brothers and other fossil energy groups are spending millions to discredit
climate science. Don’t believe me?, how the hell else have 3% of experts
managed to be taken so seriously…impossible unless they have the 1%
behind them buying opinions and PROVEN LIARS like Monkton.
She is bubbling about ORANGE LEAVES!!! So cute… blonde…
“CO2 is good for you. Therefore we have nothing to worry about. It’s
naturally occurring. It would be cruel to reduce CO2 because the plants
love it. Therefore we should be increasing CO2 emissions etc etc.”
It’s nice to know that America isn’t the only country to put mentally ill
people on the TV.
+JCToxik That 97% study is flawed to begin with. The study was bias towards
Global warming and was sent out to about 10,000 scientists. Of those 10,000
only about 3,000 bothered to actually complete and return the stupid thing.
The problem isn’t CO2 from the current atmosphere its the CO2 from the
ground being unearthed, processed, transported and burnt. This FINITE loop
we are becoming more and more reliant on, takes the Earth-stored carbon
products and burns them, hence changing them into gas, polluting the
atmosphere. This rate is increasing whereas the rate in which carbon is
stored back in the earth is the same as always. See the problem?
Also to add, quite a few people hold the misconception that carbon-dioxide
is responsible for ozone depletion when in fact pollutants like the CFC’s
in aerosol cans or other by-products of refining fuel or plastics or many
other chemicals. Now the world is a giant chemistry set and we are
programmed to not give a shit about anything but the new iPhone. congrats
species.
I cant listen to her fuckin ugly voice – the cunt…
its not C02 its the other by-products known from burning fuel:
Carbon monoxide
radon
mercury vapor
cadmium vapor
“organic compounds”
which eats away the o-zone away and allows super ultraviolet rays of
radiation that causes illness. 8 BILLION strong we say its ok to dump
chemicals in our lakes, sea, rivers, pollute the air and the food. We
destroy our only home with no regard to our children’s future.
A more eloquent gentleman of common sense is hard to find!
I found this interview to be quite infuriating. Yes, plants and trees
thrive on CO2, but this is not what affects the global climate change. The
global climate change is the change in the amount of energy stored in the
atmosphere. This is highly influenced by the amount of CO2-particulates in
the atmosphere (in the way that infrared radiation is reflected back to
earth). Yes, the atmosphere consisted of about 30% CO2 some 750 mya, but we
would not be able to live in that era…
What does Monckton mean by the “near proterozoic era”? The proterozoic eon
lasted from 2.5 bya to approximately 542 mya…
Exposed: The Politics Behind Scams Like This Video. Well, oil
corporations and and the politicians you control, nice try. But there are
only a handful of idiots remaining who believe climate change is a scam.
ECO SYSTEM…. = RELEASING CO2 “BACK INTO THE ENVIRONMENT” WHERE IT CAME
FROM. AND, OUR PLANTS LOVE IT! I BELIEVE ITS BEEN 17 YEARS OF NO
INCREASE IN TEMPERATURE. CHECK IT OUT. AND SO, INSTEAD OF GLOBAL
WARMING, WHICH EARTH-NIC GORE STARTED WITH….IT IS NOW CONVENIENTLY
“CLIMATE CHANGE”. NO SCIENCE, JUST CONJECTURE.
Boyko was totally outclassed here.
She wanted to turn this into a East Vs West problem. (Not Nice!)
Clearly she was unprepared and desperate to save her ass from total
ridicule.
Lord Monkton…you win again sir.