Stanford R. Ovshinsky has been called “the modern world’s most important energy visionary.” His career has combined path-breaking scientific work, the creati…
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Stanford R. Ovshinsky has been called “the modern world’s most important energy visionary.” His career has combined path-breaking scientific work, the creati…
Video Rating: 4 / 5
It’s a classic example of being told that they were going to do great
things with them (use them in the EV1) and then they shelve them! I LOVE
Stan and Iris Ovshinsky! It’s GM and Chevron that need to get off their
“assets” and do something with it!
I completely agree with you. And, I’m sorry for the button I pushed. Yes,
it is better to be able to believe in something. Today I feel better
because now I also can believe in you. I believe eventually people will
begin to gradually see the world in their own eyes instead of through eyes
that tell them what they are seeing. The picture won’t be easy to take, but
if we believe in each other then we truly will “be the change” we need:
together. Peace, and respect.
Many scientists who work for these institutions could easily get jobs in
the private sector. I don’t think you understand what it takes to become a
scientist and dedicate your life to science. You need to go to college and
excel at it. Then you need to go 5-7 yr more in a PhD program where you get
paid less than someone working at McDonalds and you’ll be done by the time
you’re 28-30 yrs old. Then you must prove yourself against the smartest
people (others like u) for the rest of ur life.
Proof of your pretending and making things up in your own mind to support
your beliefs. I most certainly did vote, and with an informed conscience.
You, on the other hand, are a supporter of the NWO and believe in
controlling people by any means necessary. You probably even believe the
Constitution of the United States of America should be abolished since it
has strong language against that which you have just stated.
6:48 Speaks of the true genius this man was.
I’m skeptical of the motivations behind having the symposium. The
technology is good, however, it is only solar energy (although those
batteries are fantastic). I have no problems with Mr. Ovshinsky other than
he IS BEING USED TO PROMOTE AN AGENDA. The agenda is for a global carbon
tax when CARBON IS NOT A CONTRIBUTOR to global warming. If you would like
to be controlled, stay asleep, and continue believing solar is the best
we’ve got. It is very low on the totem pole. Pay your taxes
Did you somehow realize that forests generate alot of heat, and that
removing them removes their ability to create it? Personally, I’d rather
have the forests, because you are correct, they are very large lungs of the
planet. So are plankton. By the way, did you know that in 2007 the ice caps
of planet earth were the largest ever in recorded history? Fact. The global
“cooling” happened, because the sun cooled down. The sun is what was
causing the warming.
(cont.) American Meteorological Society National Research Council American
Physical Society US Geological Survey US Dept of Agriculture Scientific
American Academia Brasileira de Ciéncias,Brazil Académie des Sciences,
France Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Italy Russian Academy of Sciences,
Russia Royal Society of Canada, Canada Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher
Leopoldina, Germany
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing His work on energy and the environment
has particular significance for the Americas.
They’re not “my” facts. they’re the facts and conclusions of some of the
most renowned and prestigious organizations in the world. …and you got?
As far as the “American people” go, they just elected a President that is
fully on board with the IPCC’s conclusions.
SURE DOES!!! Pretending is what doesn’t solve anything. WAKE UP!
Irregardless of your “skepticism”; the fact is, if any scientist could
prove that anthropogenic (man-made) global warming wasn’t valid he/she
would proclaimed a hero and be given more funding than he knew what to do
with. To this point, no one has been able to make the case.
It’s amazing what ideological bias will do to otherwise sensible people.
Here’s a man who invented PV technology that has saved megawatts of energy,
battery technology that’s in use in hybrid cars on the road today, and
more. Yet, instead of listening, people are “skeptical” and “object”
because of predetermined decisions they’ve made about global warming. Tell
us: what have you done for humanity in comparison? What have your sources
accomplished that makes them more credible than Mr. Ovshinsky?
Nope. Open your eyes, and do your own research. Start with a search on….
Statement on Global Warming Petition Signed by 31,478 Scientists That
should enlighten you as to your erroneous assertions about global warming.
Afterwards you can exchange that “cap and trade” carbon tax that goes along
with it for a sucker. Lick it, and stick it to your forehead.
At 28:47 in the video I’m skeptical of the motivations of this video. He
says Al Gore deserved his Nobel prize when all evidence proves the science
used in his study was erroneous and sometimes outright fraudulent. The
solution provided so far is nothing more than solar energy. A good
solution, but emphasis is on “Manmade Global Warming” which does not exist.
I suspect this is a public relations campaign for a global carbon tax to be
paid directly to the world bank by everyone on the planet.
31,478 Scientists refute those statements.
Climate change and atomic warfare compared in one sentence, OMG! better
than hollywood action films. Man cannot stop the sun heating, we are but
ants in comparison.