Aug. 16 (Bloomberg) — Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple Inc., talks about Apple co-founder Steve Jobs and the movie “Jobs.” He speaks with Emily Chang on B…
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Steve Jobs at the 1997 WWDC. This is the question that contains an insult based on a question asked by someone else about 45 minutes earlier. See the first v…
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Interesting watch
Steve Jobs was an overrated cheap fuck.
A living and breathing genius!
The movie was entertaining. But the movie was, aside for being about Apple
and Steve Jobs, about Ashton Kutcher. Most of the cast are not that
attractive, and only make him look better.
I don’t think Steve Jobs was quite the prick they tried to make him out to
be.
And don’t hate on Woz. No Woz, no Apple.
Should have had a different interviewer.
He’s smart because if he had been a consultant on the film after they
already had written the script they would use his name in marketing/PR to
claim he had given his blessing on everything… and he knew he didn’t like
the script.
Can somebody please get this woman a new job? Maybe something that does not
involve talking… at all.
That lady has listening comprehension problems.
No one will ever get Woz to bad mouth or say anything demeaning about
anyone. But this lady is really trying to.
Apple was 1997 to today, before then Apple was not important and not
revolutionary.
she’s not a good interviewer….. she’s a bitch
They are talking about Jobs and Gates but at the same time Linux is winning
the whole war of ecosystems. Majority of people are blind or just idiots.
Chang has a short attention span and keeps needing to pounce on a
sound-bite. Too bad Woz didn’t suggest she shut up and just listen. Chang
was unprepared for this interview, both in the area of computer technology
and business skills. She had no idea what was important and what was
trivial, thus her attempts to pose pithy questions usually had the effect
of stepping on Woz’s thoughts, just at a time I would have liked to let him
run with his subject.
Woz is under-rated. He was more of the analytical minded of the two,
understanding the nature of how things worked, and Jobs was more synthetic.
Both were important to the success of Apple, as they are to common minds.
The interviewer made this hard to watch.
She should have just shut her mouth and let him talk instead of trying to
lead him to talk about celebrities. She’s fucking terrible.
Interesting watch
Steve Jobs was an overrated cheap fuck.
A living and breathing genius!
The movie was entertaining. But the movie was, aside for being about Apple
and Steve Jobs, about Ashton Kutcher. Most of the cast are not that
attractive, and only make him look better.
I don’t think Steve Jobs was quite the prick they tried to make him out to
be.
And don’t hate on Woz. No Woz, no Apple.
Should have had a different interviewer.
He’s smart because if he had been a consultant on the film after they
already had written the script they would use his name in marketing/PR to
claim he had given his blessing on everything… and he knew he didn’t like
the script.
Can somebody please get this woman a new job? Maybe something that does not
involve talking… at all.
That lady has listening comprehension problems.
No one will ever get Woz to bad mouth or say anything demeaning about
anyone. But this lady is really trying to.
Apple was 1997 to today, before then Apple was not important and not
revolutionary.
she’s not a good interviewer….. she’s a bitch
They are talking about Jobs and Gates but at the same time Linux is winning
the whole war of ecosystems. Majority of people are blind or just idiots.
Chang has a short attention span and keeps needing to pounce on a
sound-bite. Too bad Woz didn’t suggest she shut up and just listen. Chang
was unprepared for this interview, both in the area of computer technology
and business skills. She had no idea what was important and what was
trivial, thus her attempts to pose pithy questions usually had the effect
of stepping on Woz’s thoughts, just at a time I would have liked to let him
run with his subject.
Woz is under-rated. He was more of the analytical minded of the two,
understanding the nature of how things worked, and Jobs was more synthetic.
Both were important to the success of Apple, as they are to common minds.
The interviewer made this hard to watch.
She should have just shut her mouth and let him talk instead of trying to
lead him to talk about celebrities. She’s fucking terrible.
Worst interviewer I’ve ever seen. Hope she dies of Steve Job’s Disease.
I actually think he was trying to ignore her question regarding his
consulting on the Aaron Sorkin movie, but she just wasn’t gonna let that
go LOL
Worse interviewer.. Looks like she’s scolding Woz at some points.
I’m 23 and would LOVE to just sit with Woz and listen to his story’s. He’s
like a fountain of knowledge.. My rolemodel!
THAT pisses me off, that th ewriters and producers of the Steve Jobs movie
DIDNT FCKING discuss everythign with Jobs’s closest peers. What a joke and
what a fcking insult. the people that wrote that movie and produced should
be ashamed. Also the calligraphy stuff, india, budhism, the tyrannical
stuff ALL should of been in the movie. Im sick of the movie industry
changing reality and distorting the truth.
Maybe Oliver Stone should of done it. Say what you will about his movies,
but at least he gets the facts right.
this is why Bill Gates think jobs is inferior to him, because he know he
doesnt know all the technical stuff.
However Jobs even stated clearly that find people a lot smarter than you
and do something with them
Steve shoulda smacked this stupid talking head.